Home / Browse projects / Thane, Maharashtra / Sarvodaya Classic
Sarvodaya Classic
RG-MH-44794 · RERA P51700020898 · Last updated on MahaRERA portal: 27 Apr 2026
Source: official MahaRERA filing
Saved. When you are ready to decide, the Rs 499 buyer report reads the fine print for you.
At a glance
Project
- NameSarvodaya Classic
- TypeOthers
- Location
- Khadapada Road
- Khadakpada
- Gandhare
- Kalyan
- Thane
- 421301
- Pincode421301
- MapView location on Google Maps (as filed on RERA)
- RERA no.P51700020898
- ReraGenie IDRG-MH-44794
Builder
- NameEkta Builders
- Entity typePartnership
Key dates
Key facts
Registration and timeline
- StatusRegistered
- Registered on16 May 2019
- Promised completion31 Dec 2027
- Revised completionRevised to 31 Dec 2027 (originally 30 Mar 2026)
- Buildings1 building record
- Documents filed162 files
Current status
Figures from the project's latest MahaRERA filing.
Buildings and wings, as sanctioned
| Building | Wing | Floors sanctioned | Habitable floors | Residential units | Other units | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarvodaya Classic | NA | 23 | 23 | 107 | 56 | 163 |
These details are filed with MahaRERA and packaged in the Rs 499 buyer report. Create a free account to preview, or read the full report for the verdict.
Builder: Ekta Builders
Ekta Builders has 1 registration in this build, including Sarvodaya Classic. Its filings disclose no earlier MahaRERA projects. Read the full track record. See more projects on the Thane district page.
Frequently asked questions
What are my rights if Sarvodaya Classic is delayed beyond 31 Dec 2027?
Under section 18 of the RERA Act you may stay in the project and claim interest for every month of delay, or exit and claim a full refund with interest. In Maharashtra the rate is SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent, currently 10.90% per annum (June 2026). The free delay interest calculator on ReraGenie puts a rupee figure on any delay. Claims are filed as MahaRERA complaints with a Rs 5,000 fee.
How do I verify and contact the developer of Sarvodaya Classic?
The registered promoter entity is Ekta Builders, a partnership as per the filing. The filing discloses no CIN, LLPIN or GSTIN for this entity. Your agreement for sale must name this exact entity, not a group brand name. The promoter's registered address and contact details are on the project's MahaRERA listing (scan the QR code on any advertisement) and in its filed documents, all downloadable free from this page with a login.
Is my payment protected in Sarvodaya Classic?
Partly, by law. 70 percent of every buyer payment must go into the project's designated bank account, withdrawable only against architect, engineer and CA certificates as construction progresses; since July 2024 MahaRERA requires a three-account structure for collections. Separately, a promoter cannot take more than 10 percent of the price before signing a registered agreement for sale (section 13). Neither rule guarantees completion; they limit how far your money can travel from the project.
Who certifies construction progress at Sarvodaya Classic?
The professionals named in the filing: Architect: Vitan Consultant; Engineer: Aarna Structural Consultants; Engineer: Aman Jain; Chartered Accountant: KPEY & Co.LLP; Chartered Accountant: A A Gandil and Co Gandil. Their Form 1 (architect), Form 2 (engineer) and Form 3 (chartered accountant) certificates are what unlock the promoter's withdrawals from the 70 percent account, so their names on record are part of the project's accountability chain.
What should I check before booking in Sarvodaya Classic?
Four things this page cannot decide for you: that the carpet area in your agreement matches the filed carpet area (the model agreement allows only a 3 percent variation, with a refund right below that); that the agreement follows MahaRERA's model clauses with deviations highlighted; the promoter's record on their other projects, not just this one; why the completion date was revised and what the new timeline depends on. The Rs 499 buyer report works through all of them from the filings.
Spotted something wrong? Report a data issue