This is a sample developer project analysis, generated from the real MahaRERA filing for Balaji Symphony phase 3, Panvel. About this sample · What the reports cover
or press Ctrl+P / Cmd+P
ReraGenie Developer Project Analysis · Sample
Report date: 16 August 2026
Latest RERA filing: 27 February 2026
Panvel · Thane district · PIN 410206

Balaji Symphony phase 3

by Vinay Agrawal  ·  MahaRERA P51700000973  ·  ReraGenie RG-MH-11751
Registration
Active
since 25 Jul 2017
Parcel
6,679 sq m
CIDCO
Units booked
430 of 430
100% as filed
Supply within 5 km
857
265 active

What stands out

  1. Possession has slipped 84 months; none of the 829 compared projects has slipped further. § 09
  2. 24 registrations within 5 km died at 50%+ sold, led by Shadow Nest at 100%. § 13
  3. The subject is fully booked as filed: it adds nothing to the competing stock. § 08
  4. At 430 units the subject is larger than 323 of the 332 catchment projects with a filed count. § 01
  5. At 6,679 sq m this is one of the largest land assemblies in its pincode: larger than 2723 of the 2858 parcels registered there. § 02
  6. This district is a first outing: none of the promoter's 3 other registrations is in Thane. § 10
Part I · The asset

01The subject in brief

  • Balaji Symphony phase 3 is a 430 unit project of 3 buildings on 6,679 sq m at Panvel, Thane (PIN 410206), registered 25 July 2017 by Vinay Agrawal.
  • The catchment is 857 registrations within 5 km: 265 active holding 25,216 filed units, 422 completed, 142 lapsed or revoked.
  • At 430 units the subject is larger than 323 of the 332 catchment projects with a filed unit count.
  • It is 100% booked, above the 20.4% median of the 232 active projects in the catchment that file sales.
  • Possession has moved from Jun 2021 to 30 Jun 2028, a slip of 84 months.
  • The promoter carries 4 MahaRERA registrations: 2 completed, 2 active, 0 lapsed. Part III reads the book.
857
registrations within 5 km
25,216
active units filed nearby
100%
of subject units booked
4
promoter registrations
Source: MahaRERA filing P51700000973 and the corpus joins of Part II, captured 16 August 2026.
Part I · The asset

02The parcel and its title

The parcel is filed at 6,679 sq m (1.65 acres) under CIDCO. That is a larger land assembly than 2723 of the 2858 parcels registered in this pincode.

  • The promoter is filed as owner of the land, with no other landowner listed: no landowner share agreement sits between the reader and the title.
  • No encumbrance is declared on the land.
  • A legal title report is on the filing: "1 Copy of the legal title report", uploaded 21 July 2017.

Filed boundaries of the parcel

East172-0
West178-0
North188-2
South45-18

Boundary entries usually name the adjoining survey numbers and roads: the starting point for a title search and for reading what can be assembled around this parcel.

Source: land, landowner, encumbrance and boundary tables of the MahaRERA filing. Land transaction values are not part of any RERA filing; see Part V.
Part I · The asset

03Built intensity and sanction headroom

The plan summary files a built-up area of 25,963 sq m against the 6,679 sq m parcel, a built intensity of 3.89x (filed built-up over plot, both as filed).

  • That works the parcel harder than 2440 of the 2761 projects in PIN 410206 with comparable filings.
  • The plan summary counts 3 buildings sanctioned.
Built intensitysubject 3.89xPIN 410206 median 1.50xdistrict median 2.22x2761 compared in PIN 410206

Built intensity across PIN 410206

Filed built-up over plot area; the subject's bin is marked in gold
24under 0.5x1230.5-1x12531-1.5x3531.5-2x3482-3x6023-5x585x and up
How to read it: each column counts projects whose filed built-up is that many times their plot; further right is denser. The gold frame is where this parcel sits.
2761 projects with plausible figures; 90 excluded as implausibly filed.
Source: plan summary and land tables of the MahaRERA filing. MahaRERA files built-up areas, not an FSI ratio; the intensity figure here is the arithmetic of the two filed areas and is labelled as derived. Figures outside the 0.05x-15x guard are excluded as mis-filed, and the exclusion count is stated wherever they would have appeared.
Part I · The asset

04Product, inventory and parking

The product is 430 units across 3 buildings, 100% booked as filed, building by building below.

BuildingFloors sanctionedUseUnitsUnsold% booked% construction
Wing B36 of 36Residential1450100%99.7%
Wing C36 of 36Residential1160100%99.7%
Wing E36 of 36Residential1690100%99.7%
  • The filed massing averages 4.0 units per sanctioned floor across 108 floors: the closest the filing comes to a configuration read, since MahaRERA files no BHK mix.

Parking: 3 spaces for 430 units, 0.01 per unit, 100% covered, as filed. That is more parking per unit than 0 of the 318 catchment projects filing both figures (median 0.85).

Source: building sanction, floor inventory and parking tables of the MahaRERA filing. Booked is sold plus booked over sanctioned units, from the building table, which is the one that reconciles to sanctioned counts.
Part II · The micro-market

05The catchment as filed

Every registration around the subject, as filed: 857 within 5 km, of which 265 are active, 422 completed and 142 lapsed or revoked. The map, the rings and the ownership of that supply follow.

Registered supply within 5 km

Every MahaRERA registration with a filed coordinate, plotted relative to the subject
2 km5 kmPlot No -1 Sector -…Arihant Aspire Phas…BrillanteFlorenceBalaji Symphony phase 3Active 265Completed 422Lapsed / revoked 142Other 28NDot size: filed units
Positions are the promoters' filed coordinates; distances are straight-line. Roads, terrain and anything not filed are absent by design.
RingRegistrationsActiveCompletedLapsed/revokedActive units
Within 2 km953841143,480 (45 filed)
Within 5 km85726542214225,216 (332 filed)

What this supply is, by the promoters' own declared type: 524 residential / group housing, 253 others, 57 mixed, 17 commercial, 6 plotted.

Who holds the catchment

661 distinct promoter names operate within 5 km. The five largest by filed units hold 19.5% of the known stock:

  • 5.6%City And Industrial Development Corporation Of Maharashtra Limited · 2 projects, 1,765 units
  • 5%Arihant Abode Limited · 2 projects, 1,571 units
  • 4.2%Sanvo Resorts Pvt. Ltd. · 30 projects, 1,343 units
  • 2.8%Callista Realty Limited · 1 project, 902 units
  • 1.9%Villa Realcon LLP · 1 project, 616 units

PIN 410206 as a whole holds 2,858 other registrations: 761 active, 1306 completed, 724 lapsed or revoked.

Source: filed coordinates and locations of every MahaRERA registration in the corpus. Unit totals count only projects that file a unit count, and each total says how many that is.
Part II · The micro-market

06What this market absorbs

MahaRERA files no sales history, so no single project can show its own absorption. But 232 active projects of different ages in this catchment file a sales figure, and photographed on the same day they sketch the curve: how far sales typically stand after one year, three, five.

Percent sold against months on the register

One dot per active project within 5 km; gold line: cohort median in the 5 km catchment
0%25%50%75%100%0y2y4y6y8y10yBalaji Symphony phase 3 · 100%
How to read it: each dot is one project photographed today: its age along the bottom, its percent sold up the side. The gold line joins the medians by age, so it reads as the pace this market typically sells at, not the history of any one project.
Sales filed on 232 of 265 active projects in the ring; the rest file no count and cannot be read.
  • Projects 0-1 years on the register: median 0% sold (81 projects).
  • Projects 1-2 years on the register: median 20.4% sold (42 projects).
  • Projects 2-3 years on the register: median 50.5% sold (54 projects).
  • Projects 3-4 years on the register: median 41.5% sold (21 projects).
  • Projects 4-5 years on the register: median 44.1% sold (11 projects).
  • Projects 5-6 years on the register: median 59.1% sold (7 projects).
  • Projects 6-7 years on the register: median 52.6% sold (5 projects).
  • Projects 7-8 years on the register: median 68.9% sold (11 projects).
  • 8 of the 232 are at 95% or better: effectively sold through while still under construction.
  • 7 projects have been on the register five years or more and remain under 40% sold: the stock this market has not taken.
  • The subject, 109 months on the register at 100% sold, stands above 6 of the 8 catchment projects within a year of its age.
Source: building-table sales and registration dates of the catchment filings. Median lines require at least 5 projects per age bucket; thinner buckets are not drawn.
Part II · The micro-market

07Supply pipeline and vintages

What entered this pincode, year by year, and what each vintage has become. New supply is entering slower than the previous three years: 527 registrations in 2024-2026 against 699 in 2021-2023. Of the 1786 registrations now five or more years old, 549 (31%) have lapsed or been revoked rather than completing.

Registrations per year in PIN 410206

Column colour is each vintage's status today
4622017244201853820193212020221202122920222492023244202416220251212026ActiveCompletedLapsed / revokedAbeyance
Registration dates and current statuses, as filed.

When the competing stock says it will land, by promised possession year of the active projects in the catchment. 1 active neighbour is already past their promised date holding 15 filed units: stock that was promised and has not arrived, and still competes for the same buyers.

Promised possession of active neighbours

Projects within 5 km by promised completion year; u = filed units
1Overdue15 u3520261,771 u8320278,160 u6920284,777 u4220294,557 u2620304,506 u52031596 u42032+834 u
Promised dates move; this is the promise as filed today, not a delivery forecast.
Source: registration dates, statuses and promised completion dates of the pincode and catchment filings.
Part II · The micro-market

08The inventory the subject competes with

The next buyer in this catchment chooses between these inventories. 16,816 unsold units sit across 227 active projects that file sales within 5 km; the ten largest holders: The subject itself is fully booked as filed and adds nothing to this competing stock.

ProjectPromoterUnitsUnsold% soldPossession promised
Brillante · 3.7 kmCallista Realty Limited90271420.8%May 2028
Plot No -1 Sector - 28 Khandeshwar Railway Station · 4.0 kmCity And Industrial Devel…1,58968257.1%Dec 2027
Florence · 4.2 kmVilla Realcon LLP61651117%Dec 2030
Rising Sun · 3.4 kmLakhotia Multi Business P…5035030%Mar 2030
Kanakia Valley · 2.2 kmKanakia Transparent Devel…5005000%Dec 2030
Olive Boulevard · 0.1 kmOlive Infra & Lifestyle L…4414410%Dec 2029
Commanders Heera Siddhi Homes Phase III · 2.2 kmMegaplex Properties LLP48041713.1%Dec 2027
Bharat Enclave · 1.5 kmTPV Lands LLP42234418.5%Jun 2028
Gami Mirava · 2.2 kmLal Gebi Infra Private Li…3273270%Dec 2029
Arihant Aspire Phase IV · 4.5 kmArihant Abode Limited36128919.9%Mar 2032
Source: building-table inventories of the catchment filings. Projects that file no sales figure hold stock this table cannot see; the method section states the coverage.
Part II · The micro-market

09How this market executes

Across 829 projects in the 5 km catchment the median possession slip is 0 months; 106 (13%) have moved their date by more than a year.

  • The subject has slipped 84 months; 0 of the 829 compared projects have slipped further.
  • 142 of the 857 registrations within 5 km (17%) have lapsed or been revoked, against 24% across the 7,804 registrations of the district.
  • 1 active neighbour is past their promised possession date without a completion on record.
  • The completed cohort ran a median of 31 months from registration to its final promised date (422 completed registrations): the observed cycle time of this catchment.
  • Of the 422 completed registrations, 322 (76%) carry an occupancy-certificate-shaped document on their register: the paper trail of delivery, read by document title.

Possession slip across the 5 km catchment

Months between first promise and current promise; the subject's bin is marked
665no slip161-6 mo427-12 mo4113-24 mo4625-48 mo1949+ mo
First and current promised completion dates, as filed. MahaRERA keeps both, so slip needs no history to compute.
Source: original and proposed completion dates, statuses and document registers of the compared filings.
Part III · The operator

10The operator and the book

Vinay Agrawal carries 4 MahaRERA registrations, the first in 2017: 2 completed (1 on the first promised date), 0 lapsed, and the rest live.

  • The live book beyond the subject is 1 active registration holding 145 filed units: the concurrent load the subject shares its management and its 70% accounts discipline with.
  • None of the other registrations is in Thane: this district is a first outing for the promoter on MahaRERA.
  • Across the whole book the filings disclose 69 buyer complaints and 0 court cases.

The book over time

Each registration from its registration date to its promised completion; the subject in gold
Balaji Symphony phase 2Balaji SymphonyBalaji Symphony phase 3Balaji Symphony phase 4201820192020202120222023202420252026202720282029todayActiveCompletedLapsed / revoked
Lines end at the PROMISED date, not delivery: a red line is a registration that died inside its promise window or after it.

The registrations, most recent first

ProjectDistrictRegisteredStatusUnits% soldSlip, mo
Balaji Symphony phase 4RaigarhJul 2021Active14549.7%0
Balaji SymphonyRaigarhJul 2017Completednot filednot filed0
Balaji Symphony phase 2RaigarhJul 2017Completednot filednot filed12

How the book was assembled: 3 by the same MahaRERA promoter profile (definitive).

Source: every MahaRERA registration matched to this promoter across the corpus, by profile id, phase reference and normalised name. Anything the promoter built outside MahaRERA, before 2017 or in another state is not here and cannot be, which is itself worth knowing when a deck claims a longer record.
Part III · The operator

11The certifying bench

The professionals whose certificates move this project's money and progress, and how widely each signs across the district. A bench that signs many filings is established capacity; one that signs only this filing is new to the record, and both are facts a counterparty prices.

CertifiesNameFootprint
ArchitectVastospatino other filing in Thane
ArchitectSpace age Consultant6 other filings in Thane
ArchitectPankaj Pandurang Moreno other filing in Thane
EngineerEpicon consultants pvt ltd8 other filings in Thane
Chartered AccountantVakilna & Cono other filing in Thane

Under RERA the architect certifies progress (Form 1), the engineer the works (Form 2), and the CA the cost and withdrawals from the 70% account (Form 3): these three signatures are what release the project's money.

The filing also names 1 other consultant: Bitush & Rajib Construction pvt ltd.

  • 1 RERA-registered agent is empanelled on this project: its filed distribution reach. Agent identities and contact details are out of scope of this report by design.
Source: the professionals table of this filing; footprints counted across every filing in the district by normalised name, the identity rule spelling variants require. Real estate agents are out of scope here.
Part IV · Money and risk

12Cost structure and remaining spend

The promoter files a project cost of Rs 0.0 crore, of which Rs 0.0 crore (99.7%) is certified as incurred: Rs 0.0 crore of spend remains between here and the finished project, as filed.

  • The filing records the 70% separate account with 1 bank entry: the account structure RERA's 70% rule runs through.

Estimated against incurred

Rs crore, as certified in the latest filing
Estimated0.0Incurred0.099.7% of estimate, as filed in the latest quarterly update
Cost headEstimated, Rs crIncurred, Rs crCertified done
Wing B0.00.099.7%
Wing C0.00.099.7%
Wing E0.00.099.7%
Source: the cost table of the MahaRERA filing, certified by the project CA. A quarter of projects file cost figures; comparisons state the N they were computed over.
Part IV · Money and risk

13The risk register

On the subject itself

  • 3 buyer complaints are on the filing, by year of filing: 1 in 2021, 2 in 2023. Orders are on record for 3 of them.
  • 1 matter has gone to the Appellate Tribunal on this project (latest status: Appeal Submitted): a dispute that outlived its first order.

Registrations that died with buyers inside

24 registrations within 5 km lapsed or were revoked at 50% sold or better. Each is a filed precedent of this micro-market taking money and not delivering a registration:

  • 100% soldShadow Nest · 1.7 km · Lapsed · 21 units
  • 100% soldMazagon Dock Meenakshi Co-Op Hsg Soc Ltd · 2.4 km · Lapsed · 1 units
  • 100% soldBelleza · 2.8 km · Lapsed · 1 units
  • 98.5% soldShikara Orchid · 0.9 km · Lapsed · 68 units
  • 98.3% soldSpringfield 3 · 2.2 km · Lapsed · 58 units

32 neighbouring parcels carry a declared encumbrance: Balaji Symphony phase 4 (0.0 km), Olive Boulevard (0.1 km), Balaji Pride - Phase I (0.8 km), Bharat Enclave (1.5 km) and 28 more.

49 of the 857 catchment registrations (6%) disclose court cases, against 14% across the district; the heaviest is Hillshore 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 LCL - 0012 with 11 cases.

126 matters across 37 catchment projects have reached the Appellate Tribunal: disputes that outlived their first order.

Source: statuses, sales, encumbrance declarations, inventory tables and litigation disclosures of the catchment filings. Every entry is a filed condition, not an assessment.
Part IV · Money and risk

14Extensions and regulatory friction

The subject has filed 3 extensions. The reasons below are the promoter's own words from the application, unedited beyond length:

Completion revised to Jun 2022

EXT51700009811 · original date on the row: Jun 2028

"Lack of manpower and supplies due to Covid-19 pandemic to finish construction of Phase III comprising of wings B, C and E."

Completion revised to Jun 2023

EXT51700013232 · original date on the row: Jun 2028

"We declare that the work has been 100% completed and the application for OC has been submitted. We will request you grant us an extension until 30th June 2023 under the Power of Authority to enable us to register the pending agreement of the allottees. We hereby assure you that we will acquire the Occupancy Certificate within the given time."

Completion revised to Jun 2028

EXT51700017037 · original date on the row: Jun 2028

"In accordance with circular no 28, we hereby apply for extension of our project order no. 40 in Format B. The project was delayed for reasons beyond our control on account of various reasons and more particularly on account of the pandemic of Covid-19"

175 of the 857 registrations within 5 km (20%) have filed at least one extension, against 24% across the district: the base rate of delay a business plan in this catchment competes with.

Source: extension applications of the subject and catchment filings, including the delay reasons as filed.
Part V · The record

15Filing discipline

A counterparty that keeps filing is one still running the project. The last document here landed 170 days ago; the median active project in Thane last filed 96 days ago.

  • 27 Feb 2026Architect certificate (Form 1), Engineer certificate (Form 2), CA certificate (Form 3)
  • 24 Feb 2026Architect certificate (Form 1), Engineer certificate (Form 2), CA certificate (Form 3)
  • 27 Feb 2025Architect certificate (Form 1), Engineer certificate (Form 2)
  • 11 Feb 2025CA certificate (Form 3)
  • 17 Aug 2024CA certificate (Form 3)
  • 12 Aug 2024Architect certificate (Form 1), Engineer certificate (Form 2)
Source: document register of the MahaRERA filing, most recent first.
Part V · The record

16What the documents say

  • The register holds 146 filed documents, the latest on 27 February 2026.
  • The newest legal title report is "1 Copy of the legal title report" (21 Jul 2017).

In the delivered analysis the filed documents behind this register, the title report, sanction letters and commencement certificates first among them, are read at generation time and summarised here in plain language with each document's own date: the chain of title, what exactly is sanctioned, and any condition a lender or partner would want quoted.

Source: the document register of the MahaRERA filing.
Part V · The record

17Method and coverage

Every comparison in this analysis is computed from the promoters' own filings, joined across the corpus. This table is the basis and the coverage of each join, because a figure without its N is an assertion:

JoinBasisCoverage
Catchment rings2 km and 5 km straight-line from the filed coordinate857 registrations
Unit counts in the catchmentfiled on a minority of projects; every unit total states its own N332 of 857
Sales in the catchmentbuilding-table sales, active projects only232 of 265 active
Parking comparablesfiled parking over filed units781 of 857
Pincode distributionsPIN 4102062858 registrations
District distributionsThane7,804 registrations
Intensity guardfiled built-up over plot, kept when 0.05x-15x2761 in the pincode, 90 excluded
Cost comparablesfiled estimated cost over filed built-up, kept when Rs 2,000-400,000 per sq m2299 in the district
Filed land ratesplot agreement consideration over plot area (NA plot tables), kept when Rs 50-500,000 per sq m0 plot agreements across 12 catchment developments
Declared-delivery benchmarkpromoters' own sworn past-project declarations, corpus-wide, judged only where both dates are declared46,307 declared projects
Promoter bookprofile id (definitive), phase reference, normalised name (weaker, stated)3 by profile
  • The absorption read is a CROSS-SECTION: many projects of different ages photographed on the same day, never the sales history of one project. MahaRERA publishes current state only.
  • Where two filed tables disagree (sales above all), the building table is used and the disagreement is shown, not resolved silently.
  • Positions are stated as counts within a named set, never as scores. Nothing in this document is a recommendation.
Corpus: every published MahaRERA registration covered by ReraGenie, as captured on 16 August 2026.
Part V · The record

18What the filings do not contain

  • No flat prices. MahaRERA files no transaction values for apartments. The one exception in the whole corpus is the plotted (NA) tables, where sold plots carry their agreement consideration; where that exists it is read in Part II. For everything else, the land-transaction add-on exists because the answer needs registry records and human review, not this corpus.
  • No carpet areas and no BHK mix. The per-unit configuration a launch plan needs is simply not in the filings; the massing figures in Part I are the closest filed proxy.
  • No buyer identities or demand-side data. Who is absorbing this market cannot be read from RERA.
  • A third of filings, and therefore some neighbours, carry no usable coordinate and fall outside every ring drawn here.
  • No lapse dates. MahaRERA publishes only the status name; a lapsed registration was valid until its last filed completion date, and that is the only date stated.
  • History accrues from observation. MahaRERA shows current state only; ReraGenie's change ledger records movement from the day it began watching, so trend depth grows with time and is stated wherever used.
Stated so the absence of a figure above is read as the filing's silence, never as an oversight.