Home / Browse projects / Pune, Maharashtra / NESTORIA BANER
NESTORIA BANER
RG-MH-59434 · RERA P52100050769 · Last updated on MahaRERA portal: 19 Feb 2024
Source: official MahaRERA filing
Saved. When you are ready to decide, the Rs 499 buyer report reads the fine print for you.
At a glance
Project
- NameNESTORIA BANER
- TypeResidential / Group Housing
- Location
- Pancard Club
- Baner
- Haveli
- Pune
- 411045
- Pincode411045
- MapView location on Google Maps (as filed on RERA)
- RERA no.P52100050769
- ReraGenie IDRG-MH-59434
Builder
- NameSupreme Palatial Developers LLP
- Entity typeOthers
- Track record2 past projects →
Key dates
Key facts
Registration and timeline
- StatusCompleted
- Registered on3 May 2023
- Promised completion31 Dec 2023
- Revised completionNone
- Buildings1 building record
- Documents filed49 files
Buildings and wings, as sanctioned
| Building | Wing | Floors sanctioned | Habitable floors | Residential units | Other units | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NESTORIA BANER | NA | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
These details are filed with MahaRERA and packaged in the Rs 499 buyer report. Create a free account to preview, or read the full report for the verdict.
Builder: Supreme Palatial Developers LLP
Supreme Palatial Developers LLP has 4 registrations in this build, including Supreme Estia Phase I and Supreme Estia Phase II. Its filings disclose 2 earlier MahaRERA projects: 0 of 2 past projects completed on time. Read the full track record. See more projects on the Pune district page.
Frequently asked questions
What are my rights if NESTORIA BANER is delayed beyond 31 Dec 2023?
Under section 18 of the RERA Act you may stay in the project and claim interest for every month of delay, or exit and claim a full refund with interest. In Maharashtra the rate is SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent, currently 10.90% per annum (June 2026). The free delay interest calculator on ReraGenie puts a rupee figure on any delay. Claims are filed as MahaRERA complaints with a Rs 5,000 fee.
How do I verify and contact the developer of NESTORIA BANER?
The registered promoter entity is Supreme Palatial Developers LLP, an others as per the filing. The filing discloses no CIN, LLPIN or GSTIN for this entity. Your agreement for sale must name this exact entity, not a group brand name. The promoter's registered address and contact details are on the project's MahaRERA listing (scan the QR code on any advertisement) and in its filed documents, all downloadable free from this page with a login.
Is my payment protected in NESTORIA BANER?
Partly, by law. 70 percent of every buyer payment must go into the project's designated bank account, withdrawable only against architect, engineer and CA certificates as construction progresses; since July 2024 MahaRERA requires a three-account structure for collections. Separately, a promoter cannot take more than 10 percent of the price before signing a registered agreement for sale (section 13). Neither rule guarantees completion; they limit how far your money can travel from the project.
Who certifies construction progress at NESTORIA BANER?
The professionals named in the filing: Architect: Architect Rushikesh Ravinder Hadnoorkar; Engineer: Atul Nakhare; Chartered Accountant: A N J K & CO LLP. Their Form 1 (architect), Form 2 (engineer) and Form 3 (chartered accountant) certificates are what unlock the promoter's withdrawals from the 70 percent account, so their names on record are part of the project's accountability chain.
What should I check before booking in NESTORIA BANER?
Four things this page cannot decide for you: that the carpet area in your agreement matches the filed carpet area (the model agreement allows only a 3 percent variation, with a refund right below that); that the agreement follows MahaRERA's model clauses with deviations highlighted; the promoter's record on their other projects, not just this one; whether construction progress keeps pace with sales in the coming quarters. The Rs 499 buyer report works through all of them from the filings.
Spotted something wrong? Report a data issue