Home / Browse projects / Mumbai Suburban, Maharashtra / PAREKH RADIANCE
PAREKH RADIANCE
RG-MH-45705 · RERA P51800046909 · Last updated on MahaRERA portal: 20 Jan 2025
Source: official MahaRERA filing
Saved. When you are ready to decide, the Rs 499 buyer report reads the fine print for you.
At a glance
Project
- NamePAREKH RADIANCE
- TypeResidential / Group Housing
- Location
- M G CROSS ROAD NO 3
- KANDIVALI WEST
- Borivali
- Mumbai Suburban
- 400067
- Pincode400067
- MapView location on Google Maps (as filed on RERA)
- RERA no.P51800046909
- ReraGenie IDRG-MH-45705
Builder
- NamePAREKH BUILDPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
- Entity typeCompany
- CINU45400MH2013PTC246655
Key dates
Key facts
Registration and timeline
- StatusCompleted
- Registered on20 Sep 2022
- Promised completion31 Mar 2026
- Revised completionNone
- Buildings1 building record
- Documents filed57 files
Buildings and wings, as sanctioned
| Building | Wing | Floors sanctioned | Habitable floors | Residential units | Other units | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAREKH RADIANCE | NA | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
These details are filed with MahaRERA and packaged in the Rs 499 buyer report. Create a free account to preview, or read the full report for the verdict.
Builder: PAREKH BUILDPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
PAREKH BUILDPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED has 1 registration in this build, including PAREKH RADIANCE. Its filings disclose no earlier MahaRERA projects. Read the full track record. See more projects on the Mumbai Suburban district page.
Frequently asked questions
What are my rights if PAREKH RADIANCE is delayed beyond 31 Mar 2026?
Under section 18 of the RERA Act you may stay in the project and claim interest for every month of delay, or exit and claim a full refund with interest. In Maharashtra the rate is SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent, currently 10.90% per annum (June 2026). The free delay interest calculator on ReraGenie puts a rupee figure on any delay. Claims are filed as MahaRERA complaints with a Rs 5,000 fee.
How do I verify and contact the developer of PAREKH RADIANCE?
The registered promoter entity is PAREKH BUILDPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, a company as per the filing. Its CIN U45400MH2013PTC246655 can be cross-checked on the MCA and GST portals. Your agreement for sale must name this exact entity, not a group brand name. The promoter's registered address and contact details are on the project's MahaRERA listing (scan the QR code on any advertisement) and in its filed documents, all downloadable free from this page with a login.
Is my payment protected in PAREKH RADIANCE?
Partly, by law. 70 percent of every buyer payment must go into the project's designated bank account, withdrawable only against architect, engineer and CA certificates as construction progresses; since July 2024 MahaRERA requires a three-account structure for collections. Separately, a promoter cannot take more than 10 percent of the price before signing a registered agreement for sale (section 13). Neither rule guarantees completion; they limit how far your money can travel from the project.
Who certifies construction progress at PAREKH RADIANCE?
The professionals named in the filing: Architect: ASHIM KHATRI; Engineer: CLINTDOS SANTOS; Engineer: JACOB D'SOUZA; Chartered Accountant: P C GAGLANI& CO; Chartered Accountant: PRADEEP GAGLANI. Their Form 1 (architect), Form 2 (engineer) and Form 3 (chartered accountant) certificates are what unlock the promoter's withdrawals from the 70 percent account, so their names on record are part of the project's accountability chain.
What should I check before booking in PAREKH RADIANCE?
Four things this page cannot decide for you: that the carpet area in your agreement matches the filed carpet area (the model agreement allows only a 3 percent variation, with a refund right below that); that the agreement follows MahaRERA's model clauses with deviations highlighted; the promoter's record on their other projects, not just this one; whether construction progress keeps pace with sales in the coming quarters. The Rs 499 buyer report works through all of them from the filings.
Spotted something wrong? Report a data issue