Home / Developers / Sanghvi Premises Pvt. Ltd.
Sanghvi Premises Pvt. Ltd.: RERA track record
Company ยท attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
Sanghvi Premises Pvt. Ltd. has 4 registrations on MahaRERA, including Sanghvi S3 Ecocity Woods and Sanghvi S3 Ecocity Orchid. Its filings disclose 15 earlier MahaRERA projects: declares 5 of 15 past projects completed on time.
Projects by this developer
Showing all 4 projects.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BELLA MONTEP51700016698 | THANE, Thane, 400605 | - | - | 5 Jun 2018 | Registration lapsed |
| Sanghvi S3 Ecocity OrchidP51900008323 | Near Dahisar Check Post, Thane, 401107 | - | - | 18 Aug 2017 | Completed |
| Sanghvi S3 Ecocity WoodsP51900006575 | Near Dahisar Checkpost, Thane, 401107 | - | - | 14 Aug 2017 | Completed |
| Sanghvi S3 Paradise - Phase 1P51900010903 | Mumbai City, Mumbai City, 400027 | - | - | 31 Aug 2017 | Registration lapsed |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
Sanghvi Premises Pvt. Ltd. declares experience on 15 earlier projects. None of them carries a registration number we could match on MahaRERA, which is usual for work done before the register existed.
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanghvi Valley Phase I | 31 Dec 2009 | 30 Jun 2010 | +6 months |
| Sanghvi Nisarg - Phase I | 31 Mar 2011 | 28 Dec 2015 | +57 months |
| Sanghvi Nisarg Phase 1 | 31 Mar 2011 | 28 Dec 2015 | +57 months |
| Sanghvi Nisarg Phase I | 31 Mar 2011 | 28 Dec 2012 | +21 months |
| Sanghvi Nakshtra | 31 Jul 2011 | 24 Aug 2012 | +13 months |
| Sanghvi Exotica | 31 Dec 2011 | 7 Dec 2012 | +11 months |
| Shree Mohankheda Heights | 31 Dec 2014 | 28 Mar 2014 | On time |
| Sanghvi Nisarg Phase II | 30 Jun 2015 | 7 Jul 2015 | On time |
| Sanghvi Nisarg - Phase II | 30 Sep 2015 | 9 Jul 2015 | On time |
| Sanghvi Nisarg Phase - II | 30 Sep 2015 | 9 Jul 2015 | On time |
| Sanghvi Nisarg Phase 2 | 30 Sep 2015 | 9 Jul 2015 | On time |
| Sanghvi S3 Ecocity Spring | 31 Dec 2015 | 26 Apr 2016 | +4 months |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify Sanghvi Premises Pvt. Ltd. as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. The registration certificate on each project's MahaRERA page names the exact legal entity; ask for it if the sales office only uses a brand name. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with Sanghvi Premises Pvt. Ltd.?
Add the median slip shown above to any possession date this promoter quotes you, and plan your rent, loan and school-year decisions around that stressed date. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
The record above looks clean. What should I still check?
A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.