Home / Developers / ASHTAVINAYAK CITY PUNE LLP
ASHTAVINAYAK CITY PUNE LLP: RERA track record
GSTIN 27ABCFA9750G1ZD · Partnership · attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
ASHTAVINAYAK CITY PUNE LLP has 3 registrations on MahaRERA, including ASHTAVINAYAK CITY PHASE 1 and Ashtavinayak City Phase II. Its filings disclose 4 earlier MahaRERA projects: declares 2 of 4 past projects completed on time.
Projects by this developer
Showing all 3 projects.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashtavinayak City Phase - 3PR1260002600884 | Haveli, Pune, 412308 | 434 | 0% | 22 Jun 2026 | Registered |
| ASHTAVINAYAK CITY PHASE 1P52100003514 | Fursungi, Pune, 412308 | - | - | 5 Aug 2017 | Completed |
| Ashtavinayak City Phase IIP52100021902 | Ashtavinayak City, Pune, 412308 | - | - | 8 Aug 2019 | Registration lapsed |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
ASHTAVINAYAK CITY PUNE LLP declares experience on 4 earlier projects. 2 of them carry a registration number we could match on MahaRERA, all under this promoter's own name.
2 of these declarations can be compared with the dates those projects' own registrations hold. On 1, the date given as the original completion date is the REVISED deadline that project carries after an extension rather than its original one. That changes the arithmetic on 1 of the 2 completions recorded here as on time: measured against the original deadline the register itself holds, that one was finished after it. A completion date is also recorded against 1 registration MahaRERA does not show as completed. A registration lapses when a promoter files neither a completion nor an extension, so that can mean the completion was never filed rather than that the project was not finished.
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASHTAVINAYAK NISARG | 4 Dec 2015 | 5 Jan 2016 | +1 months |
| ASHTAVINAYAK AARAMBH | 11 Jul 2016 | 13 Sep 2016 | +2 months |
| ASHTAVINAYAK CITY PHASE 1 P52100003514 | 31 Dec 2019 | 31 Dec 2019 | On time |
| Ashtavinayak City Phase II P52100021902 | 30 Apr 2022 | 30 Apr 2022 | On time |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify ASHTAVINAYAK CITY PUNE LLP as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. Cross-check its GSTIN 27ABCFA9750G1ZD on the MCA and GST portals before signing anything. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with ASHTAVINAYAK CITY PUNE LLP?
Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
The record above looks clean. What should I still check?
A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.