Home / Developers / Snehalkumar Chandrakant Nadkarni
Snehalkumar Chandrakant Nadkarni: RERA track record
Individual ยท attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
Snehalkumar Chandrakant Nadkarni has 1 registration on MahaRERA, including Saivishwa. Its filings disclose 8 earlier MahaRERA projects: declares 7 of 8 past projects completed on time.
Projects by this developer
Showing the one project.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaivishwaP51900005928 | Chembur, Mumbai City, 400089 | 28 | 57% | 14 Aug 2017 | Registration lapsed |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
Snehalkumar Chandrakant Nadkarni declares experience on 8 earlier projects. None of them carries a registration number we could match on MahaRERA, which is usual for work done before the register existed.
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multani Mnasion | 14 Oct 1999 | 14 Oct 2024 | +300 months |
| Silver Stream | 30 Aug 2000 | 30 Aug 2000 | On time |
| Silver Blaise | 30 Sep 2002 | 30 Sep 2002 | On time |
| Silver Arch | 12 Feb 2004 | 12 Feb 2004 | On time |
| Silver Spring | 15 Nov 2004 | 15 Nov 2004 | On time |
| Silver Mist | 10 Jul 2006 | 10 Jul 2006 | On time |
| Sion Kamgar CHS Ltd | 25 Dec 2006 | 25 Dec 2006 | On time |
| Sai Prasad | 28 Oct 2010 | 28 Oct 2010 | On time |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify Snehalkumar Chandrakant Nadkarni as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. The registration certificate on each project's MahaRERA page names the exact legal entity; ask for it if the sales office only uses a brand name. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with Snehalkumar Chandrakant Nadkarni?
Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
The record above looks clean. What should I still check?
A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.