ReraGenieLog inGet a buyer report

Home / Developers / MS DEVELOPERS

MS DEVELOPERS: RERA track record

GSTIN 27AAYFM8335Q1Z1 · Partnership · attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress

MS DEVELOPERS has 6 registrations on MahaRERA, including BEVERLY HILL and BURHANI BUILDING. Its filings disclose 1 earlier MahaRERA project: declares 1 of 1 past projects completed on time.

6RERA registrations
1Past projects disclosed
on timeMedian delivery slip
0Registrations with litigation
Follow this developer. An email when MS DEVELOPERS registers a new project on MahaRERA, and when the filings of their existing projects change: new sales, moved possession dates, extensions, complaints. Runs 12 months, no auto-renew. Follow · Rs 999 / 12 months

Projects by this developer

Showing all 6 projects.

Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.

ProjectLocationUnitsBookedRegisteredStatus
JAY CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITEDPM1180002501314KANDIVALI WEST, Mumbai Suburban, 400067445%20 Oct 2025Registered
ACACIAP52100013644TALEGAON, Pune, 4105063514%16 Oct 2017Registered
BEVERLY HILLP52100009758Talegaon Dabhade (M Cl), Pune, 410506--22 Aug 2017Completed
BURHANI BUILDINGP51800003165Borivali, Mumbai Suburban, 400067--4 Aug 2017Completed
MALAD RAJESH PARK CHS LTDP51800029820MALAD EAST MUMBAI, Mumbai Suburban, 400097--8 Jul 2021Completed
SUGRA HERITAGE CHS LTDP51800017335NEXT TO BOHRA MASJID, Mumbai Suburban, 400067--7 Aug 2018Completed

What this promoter declares as its own experience

MS DEVELOPERS declares experience on 1 earlier project. It carries no registration number we could match on MahaRERA, which is usual for work done before the register existed.

From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.

Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings

ProjectPromised completionActual completionDelivery
TEJAS RESIDENCY
1 Sep 20145 Feb 2014On time

Frequently asked questions

How do I verify MS DEVELOPERS as a legal entity before signing?

Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. Cross-check its GSTIN 27AAYFM8335Q1Z1 on the MCA and GST portals before signing anything. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.

How should I use this delivery record when booking with MS DEVELOPERS?

Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.

The record above looks clean. What should I still check?

A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.

Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.

Report an errorShare feedback

Data from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.

Report an error or share feedback

About the MS DEVELOPERS developer page. Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a wrongly attributed project is the most useful thing to report.

We read every report. We cannot promise a reply to each one.