Home / Developers / A R Constructions
A R Constructions: RERA track record
GSTIN 27ABYFA2302G1ZH · Partnership · attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
A R Constructions has 7 registrations on MahaRERA, including Elanza and Pushpak. Its filings disclose 20 earlier MahaRERA projects: declares 11 of 19 past projects completed on time.
Projects by this developer
Showing all 7 projects.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VrundavanP52000023802 | Taloje, Raigarh, 410208 | 255 | 9% | 6 Jan 2020 | Registered |
| Rivera Sky GardenP51600050659 | Gangapur Shiwar Nashik, Nashik, 422002 | 20 | 20% | 21 Apr 2023 | Registered |
| AlaknandaP52000001200 | Rodpali, Raigarh, 410218 | - | - | 27 Jul 2017 | Registration lapsed |
| ElanzaP51900000604 | 400025 | - | - | 18 Jul 2017 | Completed |
| IndraprasthaP52000001877 | Karanjade, Raigarh, 410206 | - | - | 29 Jul 2017 | Completed |
| PushpakP52000001781 | Karanjade, Raigarh, 410206 | - | - | 29 Jul 2017 | Completed |
| THE ACEP52100020169 | GHORPADIGAON, Pune, 411036 | - | - | 29 Mar 2019 | Completed |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
A R Constructions declares experience on 20 earlier projects. One carries a registration number we could match on MahaRERA, under this promoter's own name.
One of these declarations can be compared with the dates that project's own registration holds. It gives the same original completion date that registration holds.
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manorama CHS | 1 Jan 2007 | 1 Jan 2007 | On time |
| Siddhi CHS | 1 Jan 2007 | 1 Jan 2007 | On time |
| Pavansoot CHS | 1 Jan 2007 | 1 Jan 2007 | On time |
| Sai Savali CHS | 1 Jan 2007 | 1 Jan 2007 | On time |
| Swami Samarth CHS | 1 Jan 2007 | 1 Jan 2007 | On time |
| Gruh Laxmi CHS | 1 Jan 2007 | 1 Jan 2007 | On time |
| Bharat Sanskar CHS | 30 Jul 2008 | 17 Jun 2009 | +11 months |
| Tirupati CHS | 3 Apr 2011 | 14 Jul 2011 | +3 months |
| Shivtirth CHS | 10 Jul 2011 | 21 Oct 2011 | +3 months |
| Kaleendee CHS | 10 May 2012 | 29 May 2012 | +1 months |
| Ruhi CHS | 5 Sep 2013 | 5 Sep 2013 | On time |
| Sarswati CHS | 5 Sep 2013 | 29 Jan 2014 | +5 months |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify A R Constructions as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. Cross-check its GSTIN 27ABYFA2302G1ZH on the MCA and GST portals before signing anything. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with A R Constructions?
Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
The record above looks clean. What should I still check?
A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.