Home / Developers / YASH DEVELOPERS UNIT OF VIKRANT V RAIKAR HUF
YASH DEVELOPERS UNIT OF VIKRANT V RAIKAR HUF: RERA track record
Others ยท attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
YASH DEVELOPERS UNIT OF VIKRANT V RAIKAR HUF has 1 registration on MahaRERA, including Bhiva Tower. Its filings disclose 1 earlier MahaRERA project: declares 1 of 1 past projects completed on time. Litigation is declared on 1 of its registrations.
Projects by this developer
Showing the one project.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bhiva TowerP52000045952 | Navi Mumbai, Raigarh, 410218 | - | - | 15 Jun 2022 | Registered |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
YASH DEVELOPERS UNIT OF VIKRANT V RAIKAR HUF declares experience on 1 earlier project. It carries no registration number we could match on MahaRERA, which is usual for work done before the register existed.
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shruti Apartment | 31 May 2023 | 21 Apr 2022 | On time |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify YASH DEVELOPERS UNIT OF VIKRANT V RAIKAR HUF as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. The registration certificate on each project's MahaRERA page names the exact legal entity; ask for it if the sales office only uses a brand name. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with YASH DEVELOPERS UNIT OF VIKRANT V RAIKAR HUF?
Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
Does the declared litigation make YASH DEVELOPERS UNIT OF VIKRANT V RAIKAR HUF unsafe to buy from?
Not by itself. Litigation on a registration ranges from a boundary dispute to an allottee case about delay; what matters is the case type, which court or forum, and whether it touches the land title of the project you are buying. The case list is in each project's filed documents. Treat litigation as a question to resolve in writing before booking, not as a verdict either way.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.