Home / Developers / VERTEX NEWTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
VERTEX NEWTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED: RERA track record
Company ยท attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
VERTEX NEWTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED has 2 registrations on MahaRERA, including SKY VILLAS WING A1 AND WING A2 and SKY VILLAS WING B1. Its filings disclose 1 earlier MahaRERA project: declares 1 of 1 past projects completed on time.
Projects by this developer
Showing all 2 projects.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKY VILLAS WING A1 AND WING A2P51700000736 | NEAR KHADAKPADA, Thane, 421301 | - | - | 23 Jul 2017 | Completed |
| SKY VILLAS WING B1P51700017682 | NEAR KHADAKPADA, Thane, 421301 | - | - | 4 Sep 2018 | Completed |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
VERTEX NEWTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED declares experience on 1 earlier project. It carries no registration number we could match on MahaRERA, which is usual for work done before the register existed.
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOLITAIRE | 30 Sep 2015 | 31 Aug 2014 | On time |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify VERTEX NEWTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. The registration certificate on each project's MahaRERA page names the exact legal entity; ask for it if the sales office only uses a brand name. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with VERTEX NEWTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED?
Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
The record above looks clean. What should I still check?
A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.