Home / Developers / SWASTIK ESTATES
SWASTIK ESTATES: RERA track record
GSTIN 27ACAFS5903J1Z1 · Partnership · attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
SWASTIK ESTATES has 6 registrations on MahaRERA, including YOGMALA APPARTMENT WING B and KALASH PALACE C WING. Its filings disclose 1 earlier MahaRERA project: declares 1 of 1 past projects completed on time.
Projects by this developer
Showing all 6 projects.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHUBH KALASH APARTMENTP51600050886 | NASHIK, Nashik, 422101 | 28 | 71% | 15 May 2023 | Completed |
| AMRUT KALASH APARTMENTPR1220002502640 | PANCHAK SHIWAR, Nashik, 422101 | 25 | 0% | 9 Mar 2026 | Registered |
| KALASH PALACE C WINGP51600026544 | NR. MSEB GODOWN, Nashik, 422101 | - | - | 2 Oct 2020 | Completed |
| SAI KALASH APARTMENTP51600046015 | Panchak Shiwar, Nashik, 422101 | - | - | 15 Jun 2022 | Completed |
| SHREE KALASH APARTMENTP51600030414 | NEAR SANI TEMPLE, Nashik, 422101 | - | - | 25 Aug 2021 | Registration lapsed |
| YOGMALA APPARTMENT WING BP51600006719 | Jail Road, Nashik, 422101 | - | - | 16 Aug 2017 | Completed |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
SWASTIK ESTATES declares experience on 1 earlier project. It carries no registration number we could match on MahaRERA, which is usual for work done before the register existed.
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| YOGMALA A-WING | 3 Nov 2015 | 1 Jan 2015 | On time |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify SWASTIK ESTATES as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. Cross-check its GSTIN 27ACAFS5903J1Z1 on the MCA and GST portals before signing anything. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with SWASTIK ESTATES?
Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
The record above looks clean. What should I still check?
A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.