SM DEVELOPERS: RERA track record

Partnership · attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress

SM DEVELOPERS has 5 registrations on MahaRERA, including SM Vision and SM Chandrabhaga. Its filings disclose 12 earlier MahaRERA projects: declares 8 of 11 past projects completed on time.

5RERA registrations

12Past projects disclosed

on timeMedian delivery slip

0Registrations with litigation

Follow this developer. An email when SM DEVELOPERS registers a new project on MahaRERA, and when the filings of their existing projects change: new sales, moved possession dates, extensions, complaints. Runs 12 months, no auto-renew. Follow · Rs 999 / 12 months

Projects by this developer

Showing all 5 projects.

Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.

Project	Location	Units	Booked	Registered	Status
SM TULIPP52000078345	Navi Mumbai, Raigarh, 410206	71	4%	6 Dec 2024	Registered
SM GaneshaPR1270002501581	Ulwe Node, Navi Mumbai, Raigarh, 410206	40	0%	25 Nov 2025	Registered
SM SonaliPR1180002503037	Vile Parle West, Mumbai Suburban, 400056	21	0%	24 Mar 2026	Registered
SM ChandrabhagaP52000002561	Ulawe, Raigarh, 410206	-	-	1 Aug 2017	Completed
SM VisionP52000001174	Ulwe, Raigarh, 410206	-	-	27 Jul 2017	Completed

What this promoter declares as its own experience

SM DEVELOPERS declares experience on 12 earlier projects. 3 of them carry a registration number we could match on MahaRERA, all under this promoter's own name.

3 of these declarations can be compared with the dates those projects' own registrations hold. Every one of them gives the same original completion date its registration holds.

From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.

Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings

Project	Promised completion	Actual completion	Delivery
SM Regency	31 Jan 2012	27 Jun 2012	+5 months
SM Heights	31 Mar 2012	14 Dec 2012	+8 months
SM Majestic	30 Oct 2014	21 Apr 2015	+6 months
SM Harmony	31 Dec 2014	28 Apr 2014	On time
SM Riddhi	30 Oct 2015	7 Sep 2015	On time
SM Siddhi	30 Dec 2015	18 Dec 2015	On time
SM Acumen	31 Mar 2017	22 Dec 2016	On time
SM Chandrabhaga	30 Dec 2019	28 Jun 2019	On time
SM Vision	30 Dec 2019	16 Sep 2019	On time
SM Vision P52000001174	31 Dec 2019	9 Sep 2019	On time
SM Chandrabhaga P52000002561	31 Dec 2019	26 Jun 2018	On time
SM TULIP P52000078345	30 Dec 2027	Not completed yet	Ongoing

Frequently asked questions

How do I verify SM DEVELOPERS as a legal entity before signing?

Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. The registration certificate on each project's MahaRERA page names the exact legal entity; ask for it if the sales office only uses a brand name. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.

How should I use this delivery record when booking with SM DEVELOPERS?

Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.

The record above looks clean. What should I still check?

A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.

Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.

Report an error Share feedback

Data from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.