Home / Developers / S M A Q INFRA LLP
S M A Q INFRA LLP: RERA track record
GSTIN 27AEGFS7281B1ZX · Partnership · attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
S M A Q INFRA LLP has 2 registrations on MahaRERA, including Miraya Residency and MIRAYA RESIDENCY C WING. Its filings disclose 1 earlier MahaRERA project, none completed yet.
Projects by this developer
Showing all 2 projects.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miraya ResidencyPM1180002400061 | SANTACRUZ EAST, Mumbai Suburban, 400055 | 76 | 12% | 8 Oct 2024 | Registration lapsed |
| MIRAYA RESIDENCY C WINGPR1180002600016 | SANTACRUZ, Mumbai Suburban, 400055 | 27 | 0% | 6 Apr 2026 | Registered |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
S M A Q INFRA LLP declares experience on 1 earlier project. One carries a registration number we could match on MahaRERA, under this promoter's own name.
One of these declarations can be compared with the dates that project's own registration holds. On that one, the date given as the original completion date is the REVISED deadline that project carries after an extension rather than its original one. It changes nothing about whether that project was delivered on time.
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Miraya Residency PM1180002400061 | 30 Jun 2026 | Not completed yet | Ongoing |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify S M A Q INFRA LLP as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. Cross-check its GSTIN 27AEGFS7281B1ZX on the MCA and GST portals before signing anything. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with S M A Q INFRA LLP?
Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
The record above looks clean. What should I still check?
A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.