Home / Developers / M/S Tanish Developers
M/S Tanish Developers: RERA track record
GSTIN 27AAJFT2216N1ZV · Partnership · attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
M/S Tanish Developers has 1 registration on MahaRERA, including Tanish Moti Arcade. Its filings disclose 5 earlier MahaRERA projects: declares 3 of 3 past projects completed on time.
Projects by this developer
Showing the one project.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanish Moti ArcadePC1260002501207 | Bhawani Peth, Pune, 411042 | 54 | 0% | 13 Oct 2025 | Registered |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
M/S Tanish Developers declares experience on 5 earlier projects. 4 of them carry a registration number we could match on MahaRERA, and all of them are registered under a different promoter name.
4 of these declarations can be compared with the dates those projects' own registrations hold. On 1, the date given as the original completion date is the REVISED deadline that project carries after an extension rather than its original one. It changes nothing about whether that project was delivered on time. A completion date is also recorded against 2 registrations MahaRERA does not show as completed. A registration lapses when a promoter files neither a completion nor an extension, so that can mean the completion was never filed rather than that the project was not finished.
| Declared project | Registered to | Status |
|---|---|---|
| TANISH ORCHID | TANISH ASSOCIATES | Registration lapsed |
| TANISH PLATINUM | TANISH ASSOCIATES | Completed |
| Tanish Meridian | TANISH PROPERTIES | Registered |
| Tanish Bhakti | Tanish Developers | Registration lapsed |
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| TANISH PLATINUM P52100004292 | 30 Dec 2021 | 30 Dec 2021 | On time |
| TANISH ORCHID P52100001577 | 30 Mar 2023 | 30 Mar 2023 | On time |
| Tanish Bhakti P52100018234 | 29 Mar 2024 | 30 Mar 2023 | On time |
| TANISH PARK p52100030766 | 31 Dec 2027 | Not completed yet | Certificate Signed |
| Tanish Meridian P52100080419 | 31 Dec 2030 | Not completed yet | Ongoing |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify M/S Tanish Developers as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. Cross-check its GSTIN 27AAJFT2216N1ZV on the MCA and GST portals before signing anything. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with M/S Tanish Developers?
Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
The record above looks clean. What should I still check?
A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.