Home / Developers / Kotibhaskar Builders
Kotibhaskar Builders: RERA track record
Partnership ยท attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
Kotibhaskar Builders has 4 registrations on MahaRERA, including Tapasya and Rushi. Its filings disclose 10 earlier MahaRERA projects: declares 6 of 10 past projects completed on time.
Projects by this developer
Showing all 4 projects.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purva HeightsP53100034113 | Warnali, Sangli, 416415 | 36 | 86% | 24 Mar 2022 | Registration lapsed |
| RushiP53100015753 | Vishrambag, Sangli, 416416 | - | - | 22 Mar 2018 | Completed |
| SnehP53100021823 | Vishrambhag, Sangli, 416415 | - | - | 29 Jul 2019 | Completed |
| TapasyaP53100006819 | Sangli Miraj Kupwad (M Corp.), Sangli, 416416 | - | - | 16 Aug 2017 | Completed |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
Kotibhaskar Builders declares experience on 10 earlier projects. None of them carries a registration number we could match on MahaRERA, which is usual for work done before the register existed.
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pitruchaya | 31 Jul 2009 | 11 Aug 2009 | On time |
| Renuka | 4 Sep 2010 | 7 Sep 2010 | On time |
| Varsha | 30 Sep 2010 | 8 Jul 2010 | On time |
| Kalindi | 31 Jan 2012 | 17 Dec 2011 | On time |
| Dhruva | 22 Jun 2013 | 1 Jun 2013 | On time |
| Nisarg | 29 Jun 2013 | 15 Jul 2013 | +1 months |
| Snehashree | 30 Jul 2014 | 20 Jun 2014 | On time |
| Akash | 30 Jun 2015 | 8 Jun 2015 | On time |
| Ratnaprabha | 1 Jun 2017 | 15 Jun 2017 | On time |
| Anubandha | 30 Jun 2017 | 2 Jun 2017 | On time |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify Kotibhaskar Builders as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. The registration certificate on each project's MahaRERA page names the exact legal entity; ask for it if the sales office only uses a brand name. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with Kotibhaskar Builders?
Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
The record above looks clean. What should I still check?
A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.