Home / Developers / Ateeque Yusuf Khot
Ateeque Yusuf Khot: RERA track record
Individual ยท attribution by exact filing name, entity resolution in progress
Ateeque Yusuf Khot has 2 registrations on MahaRERA, including Ashiyanas Lake View Building No 2 and Ashiyana Tower Building No 2. Its filings disclose 2 earlier MahaRERA projects: declares 2 of 2 past projects completed on time.
Projects by this developer
Showing all 2 projects.
Largest first, by the unit count in the filing.
| Project | Location | Units | Booked | Registered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashiyana Tower Building No 2P52000030920 | Bazar Peth, Raigarh, 410203 | - | - | 29 Sep 2021 | Completed |
| Ashiyanas Lake View Building No 2P52000000361 | Khopoli, Raigarh, 410203 | - | - | 15 Jul 2017 | Completed |
What this promoter declares as its own experience
Ateeque Yusuf Khot declares experience on 2 earlier projects. None of them carries a registration number we could match on MahaRERA, which is usual for work done before the register existed.
From the promoter experience table each promoter files with MahaRERA, matched to the register by registration number. A declaration naming another promoter's project is a claim of involvement, and involvement takes several shapes: a parent and its project company, one firm re-registering under a second name, or a joint venture between two separate developers. We publish the claim as filed and do not treat it as proof that the entities are one builder.
Past projects, as disclosed in RERA filings
| Project | Promised completion | Actual completion | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ashiyana Village Building No 1 | 15 Feb 2012 | 21 Dec 2011 | On time |
| Ashiyana Village Building No 2 and 3 | 31 Mar 2016 | 14 Mar 2016 | On time |
Frequently asked questions
How do I verify Ateeque Yusuf Khot as a legal entity before signing?
Your agreement for sale must name the exact entity registered for the project, not a group brand. The registration certificate on each project's MahaRERA page names the exact legal entity; ask for it if the sales office only uses a brand name. Large builders commonly register one company or LLP per project, which is normal; the entity on the registration certificate is the one legally accountable to you.
How should I use this delivery record when booking with Ateeque Yusuf Khot?
Their completed projects have landed on time so far, but apply the same test to the specific project: promised date, current progress, and sales pace. If possession then slips past your agreement date, section 18 entitles you to interest at SBI's highest MCLR plus 2 percent (currently 10.90% per annum) for every month of delay, or an exit with a full refund with interest.
The record above looks clean. What should I still check?
A clean filing history is a good sign, not a guarantee. Filings only show what promoters must disclose: they do not show build quality, the state of approvals still pending, or whether the agreement they offer follows MahaRERA's model clauses. Check the specific project's certificates and agreement deviations, and confirm sales pace is matched by construction pace quarter on quarter.
Spotted a project attributed to the wrong developer, or something else wrong on this page? Projects are grouped by the promoter name as filed, so a firm that registers under two spellings can split across two pages. Tell us and we will check it against the filings.
Report an errorShare feedbackData from official MahaRERA filings. How we handle corrections is on the about page.