Nashik

All 7 cities with a twelve-month record of their own registered below it this month. When they move together the cause is usually statewide rather than local: Maharashtra as a whole recorded 240 registrations against a median month of 319. Read the column above as one month across the state before reading it as a story about any one city.

• Ranked by volume only. Three of the seven register about twenty projects in a normal month, so ranking them by growth would put whichever small city caught a handful of extra filings at the top and read as a market signal when it is arithmetic.
• Each city is compared only with its own twelve-month record, never against another city's. A small city against a big city's median would look dead in every report, forever.
• August 2026 is the newest month here and is still filling in, so part of any shortfall against a median made of settled months is that. How much is filing lag and how much is fewer registrations is a question our own record answers as it deepens, and not one to guess at meanwhile.

9 distinct pincodes recorded a registration in August 2026, out of 31 that recorded one somewhere in the last twelve months.

• The last two columns turn a tally into a picture of a place. On the books is every registration the pincode has ever carried; active is how many are live today. A long book with few active registrations is a built-out area; two close numbers is one still being built.
• 100.0% of this month's registrations filed a usable map coordinate. Across the corpus about a third do not, so anything geographic is stated as coverage rather than assumed.

The whole Nashik book, not just this month's cohort. Every registration that has filed a promised possession date, placed on the year it promised and coloured by what its registration says today. This is the chart that shows delivery rather than intent, and it is the reason a monthly registration count on its own is a poor guide to a city.

4,146 registrations carry a promised date. 2,284 are recorded delivered (55%), 1,058 are still on the register, and 804 have a registration that has lapsed, been de-registered or been revoked.

• Units are what this table is for, and also its weak point, so the filed share is printed on every row: RERA does not require a unit count in the way it requires a date, and a quarter whose projects mostly did not file one shows a small number for a reason that has nothing to do with supply. Read the units column against that last column, never on its own.
• The clearest thing in the table is the "on register" column above the line. Across the four settled quarters, 0 of 537 registrations are still on it. A promised date that passes does not leave a project sitting late on the register: it resolves, into an extension that moves the promised date and carries the project into a later quarter, or into a lapse. That is why the count of registrations both active and past their date is 8 against 1,058 active, a number that looks impossibly low until you see what happens to a quarter once it passes.
• A delivered count in a future quarter is early completion: the registration is marked Completed while the date it filed is still ahead.

Normalised per 100 registrations so the largest city does not automatically top the table, and against every registration rather than only the active ones, because a complaint can be filed against a completed or lapsed project too.

Independence. ReraGenie is an independent research service. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting for the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority or any government body, and it is not affiliated with any promoter, project or agent named or counted in this report. No fee is accepted for inclusion, exclusion, ranking or emphasis, and nothing in this report is paid placement.

Not advice. This report is a statistical summary of public filings, provided for information only. It is not investment, financial, legal or valuation advice, not a recommendation to buy, sell or lease any property, and not a statement about the merits, safety or prospects of any project, promoter or area. It contains no assessment of any individual project. Anyone acting on it should verify the underlying filings and take their own professional advice.

Accuracy. The filings are self-reported by promoters and published by MahaRERA; ReraGenie reproduces and counts them and does not audit or independently verify them. A figure can be wrong in the source, absent from the source, or superseded after the capture date. The absence of a fact here means it was not filed, and is not evidence that the underlying thing does not exist. No warranty is given as to accuracy or completeness, and no liability is accepted for decisions taken in reliance on it.

Privacy. This report counts filings and never names individuals. Complainants, respondents, landowners, buyers, agents and their contact details appear in the source and are deliberately excluded here.

Use and attribution. Free to read, quote and share with attribution to ReraGenie and the capture date shown above. Figures quoted without their capture date will not match a later edition, for the reasons set out under Revisions.

Report version city v4. Captured 2026-09-02. Feedback and suggestions: reports@reragenie.com. © ReraGenie.